Saturday, 22 December 2012

Kindle fire hd coupon code for new year 2013. Save up 35%

On the occasion of Christmas and New Year 2013, Amazon.com launches promotion programs for Kindle Fire HD with hugely discounted prices Up to 35% for each online shopping product on Amazon.com.

Very pleased with this product , I purchased 3 , one for myself and one for my 2 adult children we are all very happy, I would highly suggest this product to anyone.

Amazon Kindle Fire HD promo code – Amazon Kindle Fire HD Coupons

Click on Amazon Kindle Fire HD Coupons below vs Check Price Kindle "Fire HD" (Discount Up to 35%) and Free shipping Amazon.com where to buy Kindle "Fire HD" with lowest price.

Some note about Kindle Fire HD coupons codes

Limit one discount per customer. U.S. customers only. Discount valid on all versions of  Kindle Fire HD sold and shipped by Amazon. Amazon reserves the right to cancel the promotion at any time. Promo codes may not be combined with other offers. If you return items purchased using a promo code, we will subtract the value of the discount from your return credit. Offer not valid with 1-Click ordering. Void where prohibited.

kindle fire hd coupon codes
kindle fire hd coupon codes

Everything you need to know about the Kindle Fire HD:

The good: The Kindle Fire HD 8.9 has zippier navigation than its 7-inch counterpart, a beautiful high-definition screen, incredibly fast 4G LTE speeds, seamless streaming performance, and access to one of the best media eco systems available. The new Fire HD interface feels better suited on the 8.9-inch screen.

The bad: Web performance is lacking compared with that of other tablets. Its physical design is fairly plain with buttons that are too flush with its chassis. The curated Appstore means many games and non-entertainment quality apps are not available. There's a $15 opt-out for ads.

The bottom line: If you're looking for a pure media consumption experience, the Kindle Fire HD 8.9 delivers better than any tablet before it. People looking for something more utilitarian, however, will want to look elsewhere.

World's most advanced 7" tablet

  • 1920×1200 HD display with polarizing filter and anti-glare technology for rich color and deep contrast from any viewing angle
  • Exclusive Dolby audio and dual stereo speakers for crisp, booming sound without distortion
  • High performance 1.5Ghz dual-core processor with Imagination PowerVR 3D graphics core for fast and fluid performance
  • Dual-band, dual-antenna Wi-Fi for 40% faster downloads and streaming
  • Over 22 million movies, TV shows, songs, magazines, books, audiobooks, and popular apps and games such as Facebook, Netflix, Twitter, HBO GO, Pandora, and Angry Birds Space
  • Integrated support for Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! and more, as well as Exchange calendar, contacts, and email
  • Front-facing HD camera for taking photos or making video calls using Skype, Facebook, and other apps
  • Free unlimited cloud storage for all your Amazon content
  • Kindle FreeTime – a free, personalized tablet experience just for kids on the Kindle Fire HD. Set daily screen limits, and give access to appropriate content for each child
  • Coming soon to Kindle Fire HD 8.9″: Kindle FreeTime Unlimited – just for kids. Unlimited access to books, games, apps, movies and TV shows.
  • Prime Instant Video – unlimited, instant streaming of thousands of popular movies and TV shows
  • Kindle Owners' Lending Library – Kindle owners can choose from more than 180,000 books to borrow for free with no due dates, including over 100 current and former New York Times best sellers

Monday, 30 July 2012

Lời nhắn: Hoang Ha có địa chỉ liên lạc của bạn trên Twoo và muốn kết nối

Tôi đã tìm ra một cách độc đáo và vui vẻ để gặp mọi người trên mạng: Twoo.com.
Không đọc được mail này? Xem bản sao trên mạng.
Đọc mail này bằng: Deutsch  English  Español  Français  Italiano  Nederlands  Polski  Português  Türkçe  العربية‏  Dansk  Suomi  Norsk  Svenska  日本語  Română  Pусский  български  中國 Bahasa Indonesia ไทย Latviešu Lietuvių Shqip Ελληνικά hrvatski jezik tiếng Việt
Hoang Ha đã có địa chỉ liên lạc của bạn trên Twoo và muốn kết nối.

Kết nối trên Twoo
Twoo là nơi vui vẻ để gặp bạn mới sống gần nơi bạn ở
Tham gia cùng 10 triệu người.

Twoo là mạng xã hội kết bạn trát triển nhanh nhất. Hãy tìm hiểu vì sao 10 triệu người đã tham gia Twoo!

Chat ngay

Khi bạn gặp một thành viên thú vị bạn sẽ muốn bắt chuyện? Trên Twoo, chúng tôi bảo đảm có rất nhiều người muốn chat. Và tuyệt hơn cả: việc này miễn phí!

Di động

Luôn luôn cập nhật với ứng dụng iPhone và Android. Mang Twoo đến mọi nơi.


Không muốn nhận những email này nữa? Nhấn ở đây.
Massive Media NV, Emile Braunplein 18, 9000 Ghent, Belgium info-vi@twoo.com BE0834322338.

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

Google nexus 7 coupon

Google Nexus 7 VS Samsung Galaxy Tab 2

Google Nexus 7 VS Samsung Galaxy Tab 2

As Nexus 7 is competitor of Kindle Fire, the situation has complicated the atria player. The Mountain View company has in fact had the industrial capacity to produce a cheap tablet but at the same time with excellent technical features, thanks to Nvidia Kai, an optimized version of the SoC Tegra 3 that made it possible to reduce cost while maintaining virtually unchanged performance and introducing a wide range of services.

Google Nexus 7 coupon code save 40%:

NEXUS40

Traditional companies do not have this possibility and could have serious difficulty now to propose tablet competitive price and included in this market segment which then is where we make the most income. Some online sites have proposed a brief comparison between Google Nexus 7 VS Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 where our assumption is easily demonstrated. The device has a display such as Korean PLS (the proprietary version of IPS technology) from 7-inch diagonal like the Nexus 7 (which is precisely the type IPS ), but the resolution of the first stops at 1024 x 600 pixels, while the second arrives at 1280 x 800 pixels , with a density of pixels per inch considerably higher.

Same situation for the hardware platform: the Galaxy Tab 2 it is equipped with a SoC Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 processor with dual core ARM Cortex A9 1 GHz, 1 GB of RAM and storage space to local 8, 16 or 32 GB , expandable via SD card, while the Nexus 7 has an Nvidia Tegra SoC 3, supported by 1 GB of RAM and storage from 8 or 16 MB, not expandable.

Subject to the limitations on the storage capacity of the tablet Google is far superior, especially if one also takes into account the operating system, Google Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich for Samsung and instead the new version 4.1 Jelly Bean for the Nexus 7.

Video Google Nexus 7 VS Samsung Galaxy Tab 2

Friday, 13 July 2012

Hoang Ha muốn kết nối với bạn trên Twoo

Tôi vừa tìm ra cách để gặp bạn mới: twoo.com.
Không đọc được mail này? Xem phiên bản online.
Đọc mail này bằng: Deutsch  English  Español  Français  Italiano  Nederlands  Polski  Português  Türkçe  العربية‏  Dansk  Suomi  Norsk  Svenska  日本語  Română  Pусский  български  中國 Bahasa Indonesia ไทย Latviešu Lietuvių Shqip Ελληνικά hrvatski jezik tiếng Việt
Hoang Ha kết nối với bạn trên Twoo.

Kết nối trên Twoo
Twoo là nơi vui vẻ để gặp bạn mới sống gần nơi bạn ở
Join over 10 million people!

Twoo is the fastest growing network for meeting new people. Find out why over 10 million people have already joined Twoo!

Chat ngay

Khi bạn gặp một thành viên thú vị bạn sẽ muốn bắt chuyện? Trên Twoo, chúng tôi bảo đảm có rất nhiều người muốn chat. Và tuyệt hơn cả: việc này miễn phí!

Di động

Luôn luôn cập nhật với ứng dụng iPhone và Android . Mang Twoo đến mọi nơi.


Không muốn nhận những email này nữa? Nhấn ở đây.
Massive Media NV, Emile Braunplein 18, 9000 Ghent, Belgium info-vi@twoo.com BE0834322338.

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

Interview with Link Building Expert Melanie Nathan

Recently we had the pleasure of interviewing one of my favorite link building experts, Melanie Nathan. Melanie has been involved in online marketing since 2003 and is a wonderful writer on all things link building in addition to being a well-respected link builder by her peers.

Melanie runs CanadianSEO, an internet marketing company based in Canada. You can check out some of her posts from the web here, follow her on Twitter here, and follow her on Google Plus here.

We hope you enjoy the interview!

So I see you started your career by running a successful e-commerce store, which you then sold off to a US company and then you moved into the client side of things. When did this all start and how did you decide to get into online, e-commerce stuff?

The e-commerce stuff started in 2003. My husband and I were operating a successful brick and mortar auto repair/aftermarket accessory store in Edmonton, where my husband?s dad (a skilled mechanic) would fix the vehicles and we would bling them up with cool accessories like euro tail lights and hid lighting kits. When we found out that our main manufacturer would be willing to drop ship their products directly to our North American customers, starting an online store seemed like no-brainer.

I fell in love with SEO shortly after that, mostly through experimentation with various e-commerce shopping carts and my frustration at not being able to find a decent one (at the time).

Some SEO's love the idea of running their own sites rather than working on client sites based on the difference between the ratio of profits to labor on your own sites versus client sites (relatively speaking). Some SEO's like doing both to help diversify their income streams, and some like pure client work. What lead you to decide to get into the client side of things?

I?m happy working for clients because I have a genuine interest in helping people and it?s extremely gratifying being able to impact someone?s life in such a way. On top of that, the work is constantly changing and I can pick and choose my projects therefore it never gets boring.

If there?s a downside, it?s that I don?t get many opportunities to experiment with different techniques or work on personal projects. This is why I?ve been slowly making time for the leap into the ?other? side of SEO (tool creation, affiliate marketing and yes, even some BHT) with some domains I own.

I figure, if I?m offering professional services, it?s best to be as experienced as possible in order to best serve my clients. If this leads to me eventually moving away from the client side of SEO though, then I might be open to the possibility.

If you?re interested in co-developing a link building tool or an affiliate site, ping me and we?ll talk ;)

You're well-known as a link building expert and you've written extensively on the subject. Can you walk us through how you approach/plan out a new client's plan (generally speaking) and talk about which tools you use and why?

Site owners mainly hire me in order to see measurable movement in the SERPs for their top keyphrases. This means, to help my clients stand out (where Google is concerned), I first need to see what they?re up against. I therefore always start with competitive research.

Among the tools I use are; SEOmoz Open Site Explorer & Competitive Link Research Tool. I?ve also been using SEOProfiler Competitive Backlink Intelligence tool lately. I also use Yahoo Site Explorer (I?ll sure miss this when it?s gone!) and, of course, Google itself.

I look for such things as; rankings of the site, number of root domains linking, quality of backlinks, backlink velocity and social media mentions. Once I chart out what each competitor?s link profile looks like, what I need to do in order to differentiate my client, becomes pretty apparent.

After that, it?s all about looking for prospects and then developing realistic ways to acquire links from them.

I read, and actually have Evernoted (is that the new word for bookmarking?) your Search Engine Journal post on "6 Super Tips For Creating a Natural Link Profile" and some of things you talk about there (back in 2010) might have helped sites weather parts of this latest Panda parade of updates.

Those tips are logical, solid, but require a good amount of work. Do you find that link building failures are a result of trying to look for shortcuts too often or just not being willing to really put a lot of natural effort into link building?

Thank you for Evernoting (love this) and mentioning that post.

In my experience, the majority of link building failures happen simply because the linkee was too busy thinking about THEIR needs rather than the needs of the linker. They also take shortcuts that often decrease their own chances, such as; sending bad email pitches and/or using generic email subject lines and/or using poor grammar etc.

Link building offers awesome rewards, but it can be an incredible amount of effort. If you?re unwilling or unable to put in that effort, I guarantee you?ll be disappointed with the results.

Of course, in some areas these kinds of natural links can be harder (sometimes much harder) between different sites. Do you think link building opportunities are existent enough in each market irrespective of the competition (big brands, strong sites, etc)?

Or, is it more of a budget issue on the client side when it comes to being unable to complete for really competitive stuff?

I?m always up for a challenge and I have yet to encounter a niche or market where links weren?t readily obtainable. Unfortunately, sometimes the techniques required to attract those links, just don?t fit within the client?s budget. In these cases, I recommend starting out small and, as the client sees more and more ROI, they?re happy to increase their budget. After all, some link building is better than no link building.

As far as eventually competing on a large scale, I?ll just say that most people grossly underestimate the power that high-quality links can have.

What are the key points you look for when identifying link opportunities? Do you consider pure link value to rankings and/or consider links that might be no-follow if they have the potential to bring targeted traffic to the site?

The main thing I focus on when selecting link prospects is; relevance. The link absolutely has to make sense or I won?t waste my client?s time on it.

After that, I look at the overall quality (How many links on the page? Is there any PR? Does it rank for anything?) and, to save a bit of time, I like to run it through the Raven Quality Analyzer (which tells me how many backlinks, indexed pages, age of domain etc). I do all of this in order to determine how much Google trusts the site and the likelihood of a link from the site directly affecting my client?s rankings.

As for nofollow links, let?s face it, clients don?t pay me to get them links that aren?t heavy hitting so I generally don?t pursue them (unless there?s a specific reason for doing so such as trying to help a paid link profile appear more natural). I don?t build links in humongous quantities though, so it all evens out.

If you?re building links for your own site though, I would never recommend turning down a link that makes sense?. even if it was nofollow.

As a provider of services, I see that you also offer a full suite of services. Has that evolved over the years from being mostly a link building company to now being a full service company?

Do you find this differentiates you from other providers and is that well-rounded approach one you'd recommend for someone starting a link building company today?

CanadianSEO has always offered a full line of SEO services, however over the years I?ve learned from experience that it?s the LINKS that get you where you need to be in Google hence why I?ve made link building my main focus. I now look at web design/site optimization and content creation as necessary steps in making sure your link efforts will have the desired effect.

Not sure if this sets me apart, but my clients are happy therefore I would probably recommend this approach to anyone running a SEO company. You absolutely have to be capable of attracting/acquiring/sourcing valuable links though, and this is something that apparently not every SEO is willing (or able) to do.

So let's say you are advising me on how to become a better link builder or a better manager of link building teams. What would your top 3 points be and what are maybe the top 3 myths or over-hyped points I should avoid?

Become a better link builder/manager by a) developing a system for tracking progress b) learning how to be persuasive to get what you want and c) never sacrificing quality in order to meet a deadline or fill a quota.

As far as myths, it may surprise many people to learn that both paid and reciprocal links are still effective as part of an overall link building strategy. I?m always trying to emphasize that Google doesn?t know as much about your links as you think it does. Especially when it comes to how your links are obtained. Yes, they do watch for certain obvious things (rate of links acquired, unnatural use of anchor text etc) but it?s totally ok to be creative. In fact it?s best. As long as you?re being logical, you?ll get the results you?re looking for.

Other than that, I still roll my eyes at people who say PageRank doesn?t matter when it comes to links. Hi, um, have you heard that Google still uses PR as a metric of quality? I?d like to offer those same peeps a link from a relevant PR0 or a link from a relevant PR7 and see which one they jump at.

Not that PR should be the ONLY metric you use when determining the value of a link prospect, but if you?re interested in making any impact on your rankings, it should definitely be taken into consideration.

For tracking link building efforts and for tracking the links you secure, do you use tools for that (like Raven or Buzzstream) or do you do that internally?

I still do it all internally/manually via custom Excel reports. Guess I?m still old-school in that regard.

A typical link report includes such data as; link URL, link anchor text, Google cache date, Raven Quality Score, relevancy info, link type, PR and link status. It has everything my clients need in order to see the progress of their link campaigns and its also great for keeping me organized as I?m often building links for many sites at once.

Please tell us what you think are going to be the most important aspects of link building going forward in this age of rapid algorithm changes and social signals?

Many people assume that link development is decreasing in importance, but this is far from the case. Links are still the simplest way for search engine spiders to judge the reliability of a webpage. However, the way that search engines view links is changing.

I?ve definitely seen (what I consider to be) evidence that Google is using social media mentions as a measure of quality. In an age where Facebook ?likes?, Tweets and Google +1?s can be readily bought and sold though, one has to wonder about the longevity of such a system.

I almost feel sorry for Google in that no matter what they try to use as a measure of quality, there will always be ways to game it. I think this is precisely why they?re trying to move away from organic SERPs by diversifying them so much. It?s an imperfect system and I seriously don?t envy the position they?ve put themselves in.

As always, those that can keep up and adapt, will ultimately have the most success.

----

Thanks for your time Melanie! You can stay up to date with Melanie over at Twitter and Google Plus.

Melanie runs the show over at CanadianSEO.Com; a web marketing firm that offers web design, SEO, link building, and content creation services.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seobook/seobook/~3/LvegP5UJJaw/interview-link-building-expert-melanie-nathan

how to whiten teeth at home how to whiten teeth

Monday, 6 February 2012

Find Your Site's Biggest Technical Flaws in 60 Minutes

Posted by Dave Sottimano

I've deliberately put myself in some hot water to demonstrate how I would do a technical SEO site audit in 1 hour to look for quick fixes, (and I've actually timed myself just to make it harder). For the pros out there, here's a look into a fellow SEO 's workflow; for the aspiring, here's a base set of checks you can do quickly.

I've got some lovely volunteers who have kindly allowed me to audit their sites to show you what can be done in as little as 60 minutes.

I'm specifically going to look for crawling, indexing and potential Panda threatening issues like:

  1. Architecture (unnecessary redirection, orphaned pages, nofollow)
  2. Indexing & Crawling (canonical, noindex, follow, nofollow, redirects, robots.txt, server errors)
  3. Duplicate content & On page SEO (repeated text, pagination, parameter based, dupe/missing titles, h1s, etc..)

Don't worry if you're not technical, most of the tools and methods I'm going to use are very well documented around the web.

Let's meet our volunteers!

Here's what I'll be using to do this job:

  1. SEOmoz toolbar - Make sure highlight nofollow links is turned on - so you can visibly diagnose crawl path restrictions
  2. Screaming Frog Crawler - Full website crawl with Screaming Frog (User agent set to Googlebot) - Full user guide here
  3. Chrome, and Firefox (FF will have Javascript, CSS disabled and User Agent as Googlebot) - To look for usability problems caused by CSS or Javascript
  4. Google search queries - to check the index for issues like content duplication, dupe subdomains, penalties etc..

Here are other checks I've done, but left out in the interest of keeping it short:

  1. Open Site Explorer - Download a back link report to see if you're missing out on links pointing to orphaned, 302 or incorrect URLs on your site. If you find people linking incorrectly, add some 301 rules on your site to harness that link juice
  2. http://www.tomanthony.co.uk/tools/bulk-http-header-compare/ - Check if the site is redirecting Googlebot specifically 
  3. http://spyonweb.com/ - Any other domains connected you should know about? Mainly for duplicate content
  4. http://builtwith.com/ - Find out if the site is using Apache, IIS, PHP and you'll know which vulnerabilities to look for automatically
  5. Check for hidden text, CSS display:none funniness, robots.txt blocked external JS files, hacked / orphaned pages

My essential reports before I dive in:

  1. Full website crawl with Screaming Frog (User agent set to Googlebot)
  2. A report of everything in Google's index using the site: (1000 results per query unfortunately - this is how I do it)

Down to business...

Architecture Issues

1) Important broken links

We'll always have broken links here and there, and in an ideal world they would all work. Just make sure for SEO & usability that important links (homepage) are always in good shape. The following broken link is on webrevolve homepage that should be pointing to their blog, but returns a 404. This is an important link because it's a great feature and I definitely do want to read more of their content.

   

Fix: Get in there and point that link to the correct page which is http://www.webrevolve.com/our-blog/

How did I find it: Screaming Frog > response codes report

2) Unnecessary Redirection

This happens a lot more than people like to believe. The problem is that when we 301 a page to a new home we often forget to correct the internal links pointing to the old page (the one with the 301 redirect). 

This page http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/foreclosure.html 301 redirects to http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/foreclosure-2.html

However, they still have internal links pointing to the old page.

  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/bankruptcy.html?linkid=bankruptcy
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/blog/category/credit-repair/page/10
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/bankruptcy.html?select_state=1&linkid=selectstate
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/collections.html

Fix: Get in that CMS and change the internal links to point to http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/foreclosure-2.html

How did I find it: Screaming Frog > response codes report

3) Multiple subdomains - Canonicalizing the www or non-www version

One of the first basic principles of SEO, and there are still tons of legacy sites that are tragically splitting their link authority by not using redirecting the www to non-www or vice versa.

Sorry to pick on you CVSports :S

  • http://cvcsports.com/
  • http://www.cvcsports.com/

Oh, and a couple more have got their way into Google's index that you should remove too:

  • http://smtp.cvcsports.com/
  • http://pop.cvcsports.com/
  • http://mx1.cvcsports.com/
  • http://ww.cvcsports.com/
  • http://www.buildyourjacket.com/
  • http://buildyourjacket.com/

Basically, you have 7 copies of your site in the index..

Fix: I recommend using www.cvcsports.com as the main page, and you should use your htaccess file to create 301 redirects for all of these subdomains to the main www site.

How did I find it? Google query "site:cvcsports.com -www" (I also set my results number to 100 for check through the index quicker)

4) Keeping URL structure consistent 

It's important to note that this only becomes a problem when external links are pointing to the wrong URLs. *Almost* every back link is precious, and we want to ensure that we get maximum value from each one. Except we can control how we get linked to; without www, with capitals, or trailing slashes for example. Short of contacting the webmaster to change it, we can always employ 301 redirects to harness as much value as possible. The one place this shouldn't happen is on your own site.

We all know that www.example.com/CAPITALS is different to www.example.com/captials when it comes to external link juice. As good SEOs we typically combat human error by having permanent redirect rules to enforce only one version of a URL (ex. forcing lowercase), which may cause unnecessary redirects if someone links in contradiction to redirects.

Here are some examples from our sites:

  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-education/rebuild-credit 301's to trailing slash version
  • http://webrevolve.com/web-design-development/conversion-rate-optimisation/ Redirects to the www version

Fix: Determine your URL structure, should they all have trailing slashes, www, lowercase? Whatever you decide, be consistent and you can avoid future problems. Crawl your site, and fix these 

Indexing & Crawling

1) Check for Penalties

None of our volunteers have any immediately noticeable penalties, so we can just move on. This is a 2 second check that you must do before trying to nitpick at other issues.

How did I do it? Google search queries for exact homepage URL and brand name. If it doesn't show up, you'll have to investigate further.

2) Canonical, noindex, follow, nofollow, robots.txt

I always do this so I understand how clued up SEO-wise the developers are, and to gain more insight into the site. You wouldn't check for these tags in detail unless you had just cause (ex. A page that should be ranking isn't

I'm going to combine this section as it requires much more than just a quick look, especially on bigger sites. First and foremost check robots.txt and look through some of the blocked directories, try and determine why they are being blocked and which bots they are blocking them from. Next, get Screaming Frog in the mix as it's internal crawl report will automatically check each URL for Meta Data (noindex, header level nofollow & follow) and give you the canonical URL if there happens to be one.

If you're spot checking a site, the first thing you should do is understand what tags are in use and why they're using them.

Take Webrevolve for instance, they've chosen to NOINDEX,FOLLOW all of their blog author pages.

  • http://www.webrevolve.com/author/tom/ 
  • http://www.webrevolve.com/author/paul/

This is a guess but I think these pages don't provide much value, and are generally not worth seeing in search results. If these were valuable, traffic driving pages, I would suggest they remove NOINDEX but in this case I believe they've made the right choice.

They also implement self-serving canonical tags (yes I just made that up), basically each page will have a canonical tag that points to itself. I generally have no problem with this practice as it usually makes it easier for developers.

Example: http://www.webrevolve.com/our-work/websites/ecommerce/

3) Number of pages VS Number of pages indexed by Google

What we really want to know here is how many pages Google has indexed. There's 2 ways of doing this, using Google Webmaster Tools by submitting a sitemap you'll get stats back on how many URLs are actually in the index.

OR you can do it without having access but it's much less efficient. This is how I would check...

  1. Run a Screaming Frog Crawl (make sure you obey robots.txt)
  2. Do a site: query
  3. Get the *almost never accurate* results number and compare them to total pages in crawl

If the numbers aren't close, like CVCSports (206 pages vs 469 in the index) you probably want to look into it further.

   

I can tell you right now that CVCSports has 206 pages (not counting those that have been blocked by robots.txt). Just by doing this quickly I can tell there's something funny going on and I need to look deeper.

Just to cut to the chase, CVCsports has multiple copies of the domain on subdomains which is causing this.

Fix: It varies. You could have complicated problems, or it might just be as easy as using canonical, noindex, or 301 redirects. Don't be tempted to block the unwanted pages by robots.txt as this will not remove pages from the index, and will only prevent these pages from being crawled.

Duplicate Content & On Page SEO

Google's Panda update was definitely a game changer, and it caused massive losses for some sites. One of the easiest ways of avoiding at least part of Panda's destructive path is to avoid all duplicate content on your site.

1) Parameter based duplication

URL parameters like search= or keyword= often cause duplication unintentionally. Here's some examples:

  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/mortgage-lenders-rejecting-more-applications.html
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/mortgage-lenders-rejecting-more-applications.html?select_state=1&linkid=selectstate
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/credit-report-news/california-ruling-sets-off-credit-fraud-concerns.html
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/credit-report-news/california-ruling-sets-off-credit-fraud-concerns.html?select_state=1&linkid=selectstate
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/one-third-dont-save-for-christmas.html
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/one-third-dont-save-for-christmas.html?select_state=1&linkid=selectstate
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/financial-issues-driving-many-families-to-double-triple-up.html
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/credit-repair-news/economic-and-credit-trends/financial-issues-driving-many-families-to-double-triple-up.html?select_state=1&linkid=selectstate

Fix: Again, it varies. If I was giving general advice I would say use clean links in the first place - depending on the complexity of the site you might consider 301s, canonical tags or even NOINDEX. Either way, just get rid of them !

How did I find it? Screaming Frog > Internal Crawl > Hash tag column

Basically, Screaming Frog will create a unique hexadecimal number based on source code. If you have matching hash tags, you have duplicate source code (exact dupe content). Once you have your crawl ready, use excel to filter it out (complete instructions here).

2) Duplicate Text content

Having the same text on multiple pages shouldn't be a crime, but post Panda it's better to avoid it completely. I hate to disappoint here, but there's no exact science to finding duplicate text content.

Sorry CVCSports, you're up again ;)

http://www.copyscape.com/?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwwww.cvcsports.com%2F

Don't worry, we've already addressed your issues above, just use 301 redirects to get rid of these copies

Fix: Write unique content as much as possible. Or be cheap and stick it in an image, that works too. 

How did I find it? I used http://www.copyscape.com, but you can also copy & paste text into Google search

3) Duplication caused by pagination

Page 1, Page 2, Page 3... You get the picture. Over time, sites can accumulate thousands if not millions of duplicate pages because of those nifty page links. I swear I've seen a site with 300 pages for one product page.

Our examples:

  • http://cvcsports.com/blog?page=1
  • http://cvcsports.com/blog?page=2

Are they being indexed? Yes.

Another example?

  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/blog/page/23
  • http://www.lexingtonlaw.com/blog/page/22

Are they being indexed? Yes.

Fix: General advice is to use the NOINDEX, FOLLOW directive. (This tells Google not to add this page to the index, but crawl through the page). An alternative might be to use the canonical tag but this all depends on the reason why pagination exists. For example, if you had a story that was separated across 3 pages, you definitely would want them all indexed. However, these example pages are pretty thin and *could* be considered as low quality for Google.

How did I find it? Screaming Frog > Internal links > Check for pagination parameters 

Open up the pages and you'll quickly determine if they are auto generated, thin pages. Once you know the pagination parameter or structure of the URL you can check Google's index like so: site:example.com inurl:page=


Time's up! There's so much more I wish I could do, but I was strict about the 1 hour time limit. A big thank you to the brave volunteers who put their sites forward for this post. There was one site that just didn't make the cut, mainly because they've done a great job technically, and, um, I couldn't find any technical faults.

Now it's time for the community to take some shots at me! 

  • How did I do?
  • What could I have done better? 
  • Any super awesome tools I forgot?
  • Any additional tips for the volunteer sites?

Thanks for reading, you can reach me on Twitter @dsottimano if want to chat and share your secrets ;)


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seomoz/~3/RvscFeZDA1Y/find-your-sites-biggest-technical-flaws-in-60-minutes

how to whiten teeth at home how to whiten teeth

Google Loves Brands

Sharing is caring!

Please share :)

Embed code is here.

Google Brands.

Categories: 

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/seobook/seobook/~3/nERsDHfHe8A/brands

how to whiten teeth at home how to whiten teeth